So I downloaded and installed iTunes today, and set up my store account. Already I've downloaded $13 worth of music. That's one 11-song album and two free-floating songs. All of it's Warren Zevon -
The Wind, "Lawyers, Guns, and Money", and "Mutineer".
Let's stop a minute and compare. iTunes has charged me $13 ($12.97, really) for thirteen songs. For $15 ($14.99, really), eMusic is willing to give me 65 songs over the next month -
eleven of which are Warren Zevon's The Wind album. (I really should have checked eMusic before I downloaded from iTunes. iTunes may offer 99 cents a song, but if you get all 65 tracks per month from eMusic, that's a little over 23 cents a song.) That's not taking into account the 50 free downloads (over a two-week span) that I'd get if I were a new subscriber. (I'm not, so I don't get that privilege.)
In addition, eMusic lets me download MP3s - something which iTunes
does not do. (iTunes uses the proprietary .m4p "MPEG-4 Protected" format, meaning that I not only had to upgrade WinAmp but download a plugin in order to get WinAmp to play the music that I
just paid for. In addition, my MiniDisc player doesn't support M4P files, meaning that if I wanted to, say, listen to "Mutineer" in the car, I wouldn't be able to.)
Conclusion? I really shouldn't have spent my money at iTunes, and in the future, I'll probably use it only if I can't find a song legally anywhere else. Anybody looking for a music download system should probably check out
eMusic first.
(Now, this is me talking as a consumer. I don't know how much of that $15 a month gets back to the artists as compared to Apple's buck-a-track, but to be honest, there'd have to be a pretty big disparity for it to change my opinion.)