Frustration with tags
Okay, so I'm grooving on LJ's new tags feature. But there's one thing I'm missing.
You can see entries with a certain tag by going to http://www.livejournal.com/users/[user]/tag/[tag].
You can see entries with multiple certain tags by going to http://www.livejournal.com/users/[user]/tag/[tag1],[tag2].
The latter will give you all entries that have either [tag1] or [tag2]. What's missing is that I can't find a way to get all entries that have both [tag1] and [tag2].
http://www.livejournal.com/users/[user]/tag/[tag1]&[tag2] doesn't seem to work; neither does http://www.livejournal.com/users/[user]/tag/[tag1]+[tag2].
Any thoughts from the LJ-geeks out there? Not having the ability to AND-filter seriously hampers the utility of the tagging feature.
EDIT: I went ahead and submitted a support request on this topic, if any of you are interested.
You can see entries with a certain tag by going to http://www.livejournal.com/users/[user]/tag/[tag].
You can see entries with multiple certain tags by going to http://www.livejournal.com/users/[user]/tag/[tag1],[tag2].
The latter will give you all entries that have either [tag1] or [tag2]. What's missing is that I can't find a way to get all entries that have both [tag1] and [tag2].
http://www.livejournal.com/users/[user]/tag/[tag1]&[tag2] doesn't seem to work; neither does http://www.livejournal.com/users/[user]/tag/[tag1]+[tag2].
Any thoughts from the LJ-geeks out there? Not having the ability to AND-filter seriously hampers the utility of the tagging feature.
EDIT: I went ahead and submitted a support request on this topic, if any of you are interested.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Why you cannot do that right off, I do not know.
The tag function really seems to be kind of incomplete and not so well thought-out, doesn't it?
no subject
(*hug!*)
no subject
<3
no subject
(I like how the ASCII ♥ didn't come through in the post itself. ;)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject